Side-by-Side Testing: Annie Induction Annealer vs. AMP Mark II DB — Any Interest?
I’ve been considering selling my Annie Induction Annealer, but before I do, I figured it might be worth taking advantage of the fact that I currently have both the Annie and the AMP Mark II DB on hand.
If there’s enough interest, I’d be happy to run some side-by-side comparisons and share results for anyone curious about how they stack up. The idea wouldn’t be to declare a winner, but rather to give a balanced look at what each system does well, how they differ, and what type of user each might best suit.
Some areas I could explore include:
• Consistency and precision of anneal (visual or practical outcomes)
• Ease of setup, use, and calibration
• Cycle speed and workflow efficiency
• Power draw and coil behavior
• Case appearance and heat pattern
• Convenience, maintenance, and long-term usability
I’d plan to include things like photos, video clips, time comparisons, and general observations from real-world use.
That said, some types of testing are outside my current capability — for example, I don’t have hardness-testing equipment, so I can’t provide quantified before/after hardness data. Still, I can offer meaningful, experience-based comparisons with plenty of supporting visuals and data from what’s practical for me to measure and show.
Also worth noting — depending on how deep this project goes, it could take a while to complete everything thoroughly. My time is limited at the moment, but if there’s enough interest, I’ll make a point to work through it in stages.
For now, this post is mainly a feeler to gauge interest.
If you’d like to see this comparison, what specific aspects would you want included?
Examples:
• Case neck appearance after anneal (although not an accurate indicator of proper anneal)
• ES/SD differences before vs. after annealing between each machine
• Calibration repeatability
• Workflow comparisons for different case types (.223, .308, etc.)
Your suggestions will help shape what this turns into — so feel free to throw out any ideas, even if they’re ambitious. The more input, the better I can plan it out.
I’ve been considering selling my Annie Induction Annealer, but before I do, I figured it might be worth taking advantage of the fact that I currently have both the Annie and the AMP Mark II DB on hand.
If there’s enough interest, I’d be happy to run some side-by-side comparisons and share results for anyone curious about how they stack up. The idea wouldn’t be to declare a winner, but rather to give a balanced look at what each system does well, how they differ, and what type of user each might best suit.
Some areas I could explore include:
• Consistency and precision of anneal (visual or practical outcomes)
• Ease of setup, use, and calibration
• Cycle speed and workflow efficiency
• Power draw and coil behavior
• Case appearance and heat pattern
• Convenience, maintenance, and long-term usability
I’d plan to include things like photos, video clips, time comparisons, and general observations from real-world use.
That said, some types of testing are outside my current capability — for example, I don’t have hardness-testing equipment, so I can’t provide quantified before/after hardness data. Still, I can offer meaningful, experience-based comparisons with plenty of supporting visuals and data from what’s practical for me to measure and show.
Also worth noting — depending on how deep this project goes, it could take a while to complete everything thoroughly. My time is limited at the moment, but if there’s enough interest, I’ll make a point to work through it in stages.
For now, this post is mainly a feeler to gauge interest.
If you’d like to see this comparison, what specific aspects would you want included?
Examples:
• Case neck appearance after anneal (although not an accurate indicator of proper anneal)
• ES/SD differences before vs. after annealing between each machine
• Calibration repeatability
• Workflow comparisons for different case types (.223, .308, etc.)
Your suggestions will help shape what this turns into — so feel free to throw out any ideas, even if they’re ambitious. The more input, the better I can plan it out.