NEW Berger 120 gr lrht 6mm full review for hunting.

NibblesLRH

Chief Terminal Ballistics Specialist & Moderator
Staff member
Berger 120gr LRHT (6mm) – Field and Terminal Performance Review

Overview

The 120-grain Berger LRHT is easy to load, extremely consistent, and delivers excellent accuracy. Because of its overall length, gas guns may require a shorter cartridge overall length for reliable magazine feeding, but loading was otherwise straightforward. Pricing is consistent with Berger’s other offerings.

For this evaluation, I conducted ballistic gel testing at both 100 and 600 yards and documented terminal performance on 19 animals (11 hogs and 8 coyotes) at distances ranging from 49 to 602 yards.



Field Performance

Close-Range Performance

At high impact velocities, the 120 LRHT proved to be extremely effective. Terminal performance on both hogs and coyotes was remarkably consistent.

Hog (49 yards)

* Impact Velocity: 2,694 fps

The bullet entered with a caliber-sized entrance hole, penetrated the shield, scapula, ribs, and entered the thoracic cavity. Significant tissue disruption began approximately 2 inches into the animal, producing extensive damage throughout the chest cavity. The thoracic cavity was essentially liquefied, with obvious fluid movement when the animal was handled.

The bullet exited after striking the off-side ribs, scapula, and shield. The remaining scapula was shattered, and a section of bone, shield, and hide was completely blown away, leaving an exit approximately 2.5 inches in diameter.

Thermal footage clearly shows blood and tissue being expelled from the exit wound immediately after impact, leaving a substantial blood pool at the point where the hog collapsed.

Coyote (87 yards)

* Impact Velocity: 2,641 fps

Terminal performance closely mirrored what was observed on the hog.

The bullet entered with a caliber-sized entrance hole, penetrated the scapula and ribs, and began significant expansion roughly 2 inches into the thoracic cavity. Internal damage to the chest cavity was extensive, and the lungs and surrounding tissues were completely destroyed.

The bullet exited after striking the off-side ribs and scapula, producing an exit wound measuring approximately 3.5 × 4 inches. A portion of the scapula and hide was blown away, while the remaining scapula was shattered.



Ballistic Gel Testing

The gel testing closely matched what was observed on animals. Bone and heavier tissue resistance in live animals caused expansion to begin slightly sooner than in bare gel, but the overall wound characteristics remained very similar.

At 600 yards, the bullet produced a narrower wound cavity with greater penetration, as expected from the lower impact velocity.

100-Yard Results

The bullet expanded rapidly and shed approximately three-quarters of the way through the wound channel, with multiple large fragments continuing through the remaining gel block.

600-Yard Results

The bullet expanded while remaining largely intact, shedding only a small amount of material during penetration. It maintained stable, straight-line penetration throughout the gel without excessive yaw or deviation.



Accuracy

Accuracy was outstanding throughout testing.

Using an MTE 6mm Creedmoor with a 26-inch 1:7 twist barrel at a muzzle velocity of 2,764 fps, I documented:

* 3-shot group at 400 yards: 0.42 MOA
* 5-shot group at 700 yards: 0.35 MOA

All groups were fired standing from a tripod in field conditions. The ballistic gel testing at both 100 and 600 yards was also conducted from this position.



Terminal Performance Analysis

Overall, the 120 LRHT performed very well for a BTHP/OTM-style hunting bullet. However, its terminal behavior is influenced by several aspects of its design.

Compared to Berger’s Hybrid bullets, the 120 LRHT has a long, slender nose with a relatively small frontal diameter. This provides less initial surface area during impact, meaning the nose must collapse farther before contacting the flat front of the lead core where full expansion begins.

For proper expansion, timing is critical. The nose must collapse straight rearward into the core. If impact velocity is too low, or impact conditions prevent this from occurring, the nose can fold to one side instead of collapsing directly backward.

When this occurs, the bullet may fail to expand normally and instead yaw or tumble after entering the target, producing less predictable terminal performance.



Impact Velocity

Because of its geometry, this bullet requires a higher minimum impact velocity than Berger’s Hybrid bullets.

While Berger Hybrids have demonstrated reliable expansion down to approximately 1,600 fps, the 120 LRHT appears to require approximately 1,800–1,900 fps for consistent expansion.

Greater impact resistance—such as striking heavier bone—can aid expansion, but maintaining adequate impact velocity remains the most important factor for reliable terminal performance.

Simply put, velocity is this bullet’s friend.



Impact Angle Considerations

Like most BTHP and OTM bullets, the 120 LRHT is also somewhat sensitive to impact angle.

Berger addressed the clogging issues commonly associated with small meplats by incorporating a large internal nose cavity. Even if debris fills the opening, the collapsing nose can still contact the flat front of the lead core and initiate expansion.

However, because of the bullet’s particularly long, slender nose, excessive impact angle increases the likelihood that the nose will collapse sideways rather than directly rearward. If this occurs before the bullet fully enters the animal, penetration can be shallow. If it occurs after entry, the bullet may yaw or tumble, producing less consistent wound channels.

These characteristics are not unique to the 120 LRHT, but the bullet’s geometry makes it somewhat more susceptible than shorter, wider-nosed BTHP designs.



Strengths

The long, slender nose also provides an advantage.

Because significant expansion begins later in penetration, the bullet is capable of passing through heavy hide, shoulder bone, or a mature boar’s shield before producing its maximum wound cavity inside the thoracic cavity. This can improve penetration on tougher animals compared to bullets that begin expanding almost immediately upon impact.

The bullet also offers excellent external ballistics, producing outstanding consistency and accuracy while retaining velocity exceptionally well.



Limitations

The tradeoff is its higher minimum expansion velocity.

Hunters should understand the bullet’s effective operating window and ensure expected impact velocities remain above approximately 1,800–1,900 fps for dependable terminal performance.



Final Thoughts

Overall, the Berger 120 LRHT is an excellent performer both externally and terminally. It delivers exceptional accuracy, high ballistic efficiency, and excellent terminal performance when used within its intended operating window.

Compared to the 105- and 109-grain Berger Hybrids, the 120 LRHT sacrifices some low-velocity expansion capability but gains durability at higher impact velocities and through heavier resistance, making it particularly well suited for shoulder impacts and larger-bodied game.

As with any hunting bullet, understanding its strengths and limitations is the key to achieving consistent results in the field.IMG_8074.jpegIMG_8013.jpegIMG_8048.jpegIMG_8014.jpegIMG_7832.jpegIMG_7880.pngb8145ecc1e0ffdbba2892a11466fa759.jpeg
 
Berger 120gr LRHT (6mm) – Field and Terminal Performance Review

Overview

The 120-grain Berger LRHT is easy to load, extremely consistent, and delivers excellent accuracy. Because of its overall length, gas guns may require a shorter cartridge overall length for reliable magazine feeding, but loading was otherwise straightforward. Pricing is consistent with Berger’s other offerings.

For this evaluation, I conducted ballistic gel testing at both 100 and 600 yards and documented terminal performance on 19 animals (11 hogs and 8 coyotes) at distances ranging from 49 to 602 yards.



Field Performance

Close-Range Performance

At high impact velocities, the 120 LRHT proved to be extremely effective. Terminal performance on both hogs and coyotes was remarkably consistent.

Hog (49 yards)

* Impact Velocity: 2,694 fps

The bullet entered with a caliber-sized entrance hole, penetrated the shield, scapula, ribs, and entered the thoracic cavity. Significant tissue disruption began approximately 2 inches into the animal, producing extensive damage throughout the chest cavity. The thoracic cavity was essentially liquefied, with obvious fluid movement when the animal was handled.

The bullet exited after striking the off-side ribs, scapula, and shield. The remaining scapula was shattered, and a section of bone, shield, and hide was completely blown away, leaving an exit approximately 2.5 inches in diameter.

Thermal footage clearly shows blood and tissue being expelled from the exit wound immediately after impact, leaving a substantial blood pool at the point where the hog collapsed.

Coyote (87 yards)

* Impact Velocity: 2,641 fps

Terminal performance closely mirrored what was observed on the hog.

The bullet entered with a caliber-sized entrance hole, penetrated the scapula and ribs, and began significant expansion roughly 2 inches into the thoracic cavity. Internal damage to the chest cavity was extensive, and the lungs and surrounding tissues were completely destroyed.

The bullet exited after striking the off-side ribs and scapula, producing an exit wound measuring approximately 3.5 × 4 inches. A portion of the scapula and hide was blown away, while the remaining scapula was shattered.



Ballistic Gel Testing

The gel testing closely matched what was observed on animals. Bone and heavier tissue resistance in live animals caused expansion to begin slightly sooner than in bare gel, but the overall wound characteristics remained very similar.

At 600 yards, the bullet produced a narrower wound cavity with greater penetration, as expected from the lower impact velocity.

100-Yard Results

The bullet expanded rapidly and shed approximately three-quarters of the way through the wound channel, with multiple large fragments continuing through the remaining gel block.

600-Yard Results

The bullet expanded while remaining largely intact, shedding only a small amount of material during penetration. It maintained stable, straight-line penetration throughout the gel without excessive yaw or deviation.



Accuracy

Accuracy was outstanding throughout testing.

Using an MTE 6mm Creedmoor with a 26-inch 1:7 twist barrel at a muzzle velocity of 2,764 fps, I documented:

* 3-shot group at 400 yards: 0.42 MOA
* 5-shot group at 700 yards: 0.35 MOA

All groups were fired standing from a tripod in field conditions. The ballistic gel testing at both 100 and 600 yards was also conducted from this position.



Terminal Performance Analysis

Overall, the 120 LRHT performed very well for a BTHP/OTM-style hunting bullet. However, its terminal behavior is influenced by several aspects of its design.

Compared to Berger’s Hybrid bullets, the 120 LRHT has a long, slender nose with a relatively small frontal diameter. This provides less initial surface area during impact, meaning the nose must collapse farther before contacting the flat front of the lead core where full expansion begins.

For proper expansion, timing is critical. The nose must collapse straight rearward into the core. If impact velocity is too low, or impact conditions prevent this from occurring, the nose can fold to one side instead of collapsing directly backward.

When this occurs, the bullet may fail to expand normally and instead yaw or tumble after entering the target, producing less predictable terminal performance.



Impact Velocity

Because of its geometry, this bullet requires a higher minimum impact velocity than Berger’s Hybrid bullets.

While Berger Hybrids have demonstrated reliable expansion down to approximately 1,600 fps, the 120 LRHT appears to require approximately 1,800–1,900 fps for consistent expansion.

Greater impact resistance—such as striking heavier bone—can aid expansion, but maintaining adequate impact velocity remains the most important factor for reliable terminal performance.

Simply put, velocity is this bullet’s friend.



Impact Angle Considerations

Like most BTHP and OTM bullets, the 120 LRHT is also somewhat sensitive to impact angle.

Berger addressed the clogging issues commonly associated with small meplats by incorporating a large internal nose cavity. Even if debris fills the opening, the collapsing nose can still contact the flat front of the lead core and initiate expansion.

However, because of the bullet’s particularly long, slender nose, excessive impact angle increases the likelihood that the nose will collapse sideways rather than directly rearward. If this occurs before the bullet fully enters the animal, penetration can be shallow. If it occurs after entry, the bullet may yaw or tumble, producing less consistent wound channels.

These characteristics are not unique to the 120 LRHT, but the bullet’s geometry makes it somewhat more susceptible than shorter, wider-nosed BTHP designs.



Strengths

The long, slender nose also provides an advantage.

Because significant expansion begins later in penetration, the bullet is capable of passing through heavy hide, shoulder bone, or a mature boar’s shield before producing its maximum wound cavity inside the thoracic cavity. This can improve penetration on tougher animals compared to bullets that begin expanding almost immediately upon impact.

The bullet also offers excellent external ballistics, producing outstanding consistency and accuracy while retaining velocity exceptionally well.



Limitations

The tradeoff is its higher minimum expansion velocity.

Hunters should understand the bullet’s effective operating window and ensure expected impact velocities remain above approximately 1,800–1,900 fps for dependable terminal performance.



Final Thoughts

Overall, the Berger 120 LRHT is an excellent performer both externally and terminally. It delivers exceptional accuracy, high ballistic efficiency, and excellent terminal performance when used within its intended operating window.

Compared to the 105- and 109-grain Berger Hybrids, the 120 LRHT sacrifices some low-velocity expansion capability but gains durability at higher impact velocities and through heavier resistance, making it particularly well suited for shoulder impacts and larger-bodied game.

As with any hunting bullet, understanding its strengths and limitations is the key to achieving consistent results in the field.View attachment 294View attachment 296View attachment 295View attachment 297View attachment 298View attachment 299View attachment 300
Awesome review, Jared! This is great content and information for the site and members. Thanks for all the work you put into the testing and write-up.
 
Awesome review, Jared! This is great content and information for the site and members. Thanks for all the work you put into the testing and write-up.
Thanks I appreciate it and your help in this. I’ll post the full video when I finish it with videos and pictures.
 
Thanks I always try and be as thorough as possible.
I reread your review more thoroughly, and picked up even more little bits of information. I'm really interested in this bullet. I also liked how your explained how the Berger bullets expand. I have noticed since I started using Berger hybrids for hunting, most people don't truly understand how they work. You explained it very clearly.

I also liked your explanation on what could possibly happen on steep impact angles. Very interesting. Do you think a tipped bullet is any more or less predisposed to this phenomenon?

Steve
 
I reread your review more thoroughly, and picked up even more little bits of information. I'm really interested in this bullet. I also liked how your explained how the Berger bullets expand. I have noticed since I started using Berger hybrids for hunting, most people don't truly understand how they work. You explained it very clearly.

I also liked your explanation on what could possibly happen on steep impact angles. Very interesting. Do you think a tipped bullet is any more or less predisposed to this phenomenon?

Steve
Tipped bullets aren’t really affected by impact angles. The V shape of the cavity guides the tip backwards into the core. So even on angled impacts the tip is being guided straight backwards into the core to initiate expansion. Tipped bullets have two methods of expansion. The tip hitting the core and the edges flaring out as the tip is pushed backwards. The edges of the bullet flare out catching material which forces it open. Tipped bullets also have a large hollow point which gives better and more violent expansion. The tip serves multiple purposes. It’s fills the hollow point and allows for less drag and higher bc’s. It also acts like a splitting wedge forcing the bullet to flare while impacting the core forcing expansion. I prefer tipped bullets as they give you the best and most reliable expansion and terminal performance.
 
Tipped bullets aren’t really affected by impact angles. The V shape of the cavity guides the tip backwards into the core. So even on angled impacts the tip is being guided straight backwards into the core to initiate expansion. Tipped bullets have two methods of expansion. The tip hitting the core and the edges flaring out as the tip is pushed backwards. The edges of the bullet flare out catching material which forces it open. Tipped bullets also have a large hollow point which gives better and more violent expansion. The tip serves multiple purposes. It’s fills the hollow point and allows for less drag and higher bc’s. It also acts like a splitting wedge forcing the bullet to flare while impacting the core forcing expansion. I prefer tipped bullets as they give you the best and most reliable expansion and terminal performance.
Thanks for the response. Everything you have shared with me makes sense. All things considered, I think I will stay with the 109 ELD-M for my antelope this year. It performed perfectly last year on a long shot. I already have a load that shoots well in the rifle. I was considering using the 120 LRHT, but I just don't see it in the cards. Antelope don't offer a lot of resistance for a bullet that is a bit on the tough side. I also don't see a lot of spare time between now and season opener to devote to finding a well tuned load, although I would be shocked if finding a good load would be that difficult. I will spend the time practicing and getting my wife's new rifle ready. Take care and have fun poking them pigs!

Steve
 
Thanks for the response. Everything you have shared with me makes sense. All things considered, I think I will stay with the 109 ELD-M for my antelope this year. It performed perfectly last year on a long shot. I already have a load that shoots well in the rifle. I was considering using the 120 LRHT, but I just don't see it in the cards. Antelope don't offer a lot of resistance for a bullet that is a bit on the tough side. I also don't see a lot of spare time between now and season opener to devote to finding a well tuned load, although I would be shocked if finding a good load would be that difficult. I will spend the time practicing and getting my wife's new rifle ready. Take care and have fun poking them pigs!

Steve
Honestly the 120 is a good bullet when used within its operating range. It isn’t as good as eld m, a tips, or TMK’s though. They shoot well in my rifle but they aren’t good enough for me to switch over to them from my regular load of A tips. Hopefully this next hog trip will be my best one. I have one more hog night weeks and then it’s shifting to getting ready for archery deer. Gotta get stands up, clear lanes, etc. I have seen some really big deer while hunting at night with thermals. Judging on what I’m seeing on thermals this deer season could be very good for big bucks.
 
Honestly the 120 is a good bullet when used within its operating range. It isn’t as good as eld m, a tips, or TMK’s though. They shoot well in my rifle but they aren’t good enough for me to switch over to them from my regular load of A tips. Hopefully this next hog trip will be my best one. I have one more hog night weeks and then it’s shifting to getting ready for archery deer. Gotta get stands up, clear lanes, etc. I have seen some really big deer while hunting at night with thermals. Judging on what I’m seeing on thermals this deer season could be very good for big bucks.
I am confident they will shoot very well in a properly twisted barrel. Lately, I have been having really good luck getting Bergers to shoot, as long as I use a good barrel, good brass, good primers, and choose a powder that gives me good case fill. I bet they will do a great job of banging steel at long range in the 6 CM and larger. Correct me if I am wrong, but after reading your terminal test information, I think they might open a little too slow for pronghorns at more extended ranges. The 109 eld-m did such a nice job for me last year, I really can't justify changing I need to get my new scope and suppressor dialed-in, and go start practicing.

BTW, I noticed that Sierra has introduced a 116 gr TMK. I'm intrigued.
 
I am confident they will shoot very well in a properly twisted barrel. Lately, I have been having really good luck getting Bergers to shoot, as long as I use a good barrel, good brass, good primers, and choose a powder that gives me good case fill. I bet they will do a great job of banging steel at long range in the 6 CM and larger. Correct me if I am wrong, but after reading your terminal test information, I think they might open a little too slow for pronghorns at more extended ranges. The 109 eld-m did such a nice job for me last year, I really can't justify changing I need to get my new scope and suppressor dialed-in, and go start practicing.

BTW, I noticed that Sierra has introduced a 116 gr TMK. I'm intrigued.
Just stick with the 109 eld m it will give you better performance at less cost.
 
Connect with Hawkeye Ammosmithing
Back
Top